Moral Argument For The Existence Of God – Directions In groups of two or three, write on a blank sheet of paper all the possible objections a person might have to believing in Jesus Christ/God/Creator.

Presentation on theme: “Directions In groups of two or three, write on a blank sheet of paper all the possible objections a person might have to believing in Jesus Christ/God/Creator.”— Presentation transcript:

Moral Argument For The Existence Of God

1 Directions In groups of two or three, write on a blank sheet of paper all the possible objections a person might have to believing in Jesus Christ/God/Creator. it can be doubts or questions that you yourself have experienced or heard from someone you know.

Pdf) God And The Ontological Foundation Of Morality

Sound reasoning (mental process that uses arguments to draw conclusions from facts) in support of the biblical claims of Christ. We will specifically deal with the most important apologetic issues of: 1. Existence of God 2. Reliability of the gospel reports regarding Christ. 3. General objections to Christianity

Why is apologetics important? 2 Timothy 4:2-4 “…be ready in season and out of season; rebuke, rebuke and admonish, with perfect patience and teaching. 3 For there comes a time when people will not tolerate sound teaching, but with itching ears will gather for their teachers what suits their own desires, 4 and will deviate from listening to the truth and wander away in myths.”

The Existence of God: How Do You Know God Exists? Write one or two arguments that help convince you that God exists.

God is greater than the greatest thing we can think of. Things can only exist in our minds or in our thoughts and reality. It would be greater if God existed in our minds and reality than just in our minds. Therefore, God exists in reality.

The Moral Argument For The Existence Of God

The First Cause Argument (or “Cosmological Argument” or “Kalam Argument”) Everything that begins to exist has a cause.

The First Cause Argument (or “Cosmological Argument” or “Kalam Argument”) Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The Universe began to exist.

The First Cause Argument (or “Cosmological Argument” or “Kalam Argument”) Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The Universe began to exist. Therefore the Universe has a cause. God is by definition the First Cause.

He was colossally fat, one large eye dwarfing his other. One of the most important philosophers of the church.

Amazon.com: George H. Dunne: Books, Biography, Latest Update

The First Cause Argument (or “Cosmological Argument” or “Kalam Argument”) Everything that begins to exist has a cause. The Universe began to exist. Therefore the Universe has a cause. That “first cause” is assumed to be God.

Everything that moves is moved by another. So there must exist an Unmoved Mover. This is the definition of God.

Since all existing things (contingent being) depend on other things for their existence, there must exist at least one thing that is not dependent (contingent) and so is a Necessary Being. God is by definition the “Essential Being”.

Since all existing things can be compared to such qualities as degrees of goodness, there must exist something that is an Absolutely Good Being (otherwise such comparisons would be meaningless) God is by definition an Absolutely Good Being

Pdf) Thomistic Moral Arguments

The world … exhibits incredible teleological order. Objects that exhibit such order… are products of intelligent design. It is more likely that the world is a result of intelligent design than of random processes. Probably, an intelligent designer (God) made the world.

The odds of life in any universe are astronomically small – virtually zero, based on chance; intelligent design is more likely. (don’t write it all) Focus on the fact that the universe is suitable for human habitation. There are many ways the universe could have been—it could have had different laws of physics; it might have had a different arrangement of planets and stars; it might have started with a bigger or a smaller big bang—and the vast majority of these universes would not have allowed the existence of life. We are very lucky indeed to have a universe that does.

Most people in the history of the world believed in a Creator. The probability that almost everyone believes wrongly is small; Therefore, it is likely that a Creator exists (or existed).

The moral argument appeals to the existence of moral laws as proof of God’s existence. According to this argument, there can be no such thing as morality without God; to use the words Sartre attributed to Dostoyevsky, “If there is no God, then everything is permissible.” Because there are moral laws, and not everything is impermissible, God exists.

Arguments For The Existence Of God.

Morality cannot exist without God establishing it. Morality does exist. Therefore it is necessary that God also exists [or existed].

Pascal, and the bet The possibility that God exists is greater than zero. If you believe that God exists, and he does, then you’ve got it all — an eternity in Heaven. If God does not exist, then you have lost nothing. The Bible is wrong. God, Heaven, Hell etc do not exist. Therefore, the better option is to accept that God does exist.

The First Cause Argument Argument from Tradition The Argument from Design … Pascal, and the Wager The Moral Argument for God’s Existence

The First Cause Argument Argument from Tradition The Argument from Design … Pascal, and the Wager The Moral Argument for God’s Existence The Natural Law Argument

Is God Necessary For Morality? Evaluating The Exchange Between Linville And Antony — Moral Apologetics

Download ppt “Directions In groups of two or three, write on a blank sheet of paper all the possible objections a person might have to believing in Jesus Christ/God/Creator.”

To make this website work, we record user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including Cookie Policy. God and morality are often lumped together. Many religious believers think that morality is not possible without God. And some religious believers use this alleged dependence between God and morality as the basis for an argument in favor of his existence. As I noted in part one, there are two main forms these arguments take:

Evidentiary arguments: These are arguments that emphasize the existence of some moral fact (E) and argue that God is the best explanation of E. This provides some support for the existence of God.

Non-probative arguments: These are arguments that highlight some moral goal or end and argue that God’s existence is necessary if that goal or end is to be achieved.

Solution: Testing Moral Arguments Presentation

We looked at evidentiary arguments and their problems in part one. Today we will look at non-evidential arguments. Again I take my guidance from Peter Byrne’s article ‘Kant and the Moral Argument’, which can be found in Jeffrey Jordan’s book Key Thinkers in Philosophy of Religion. Since Kant himself is a proponent of a non-evidential argument, and since Byrne’s essay is ostensibly about Kant, it is not surprising that the analysis of Kant’s argument takes up more space in Byrne’s article than the analysis of the evidentiary arguments. I tend to find non-evidential arguments less interesting, for reasons that will become clear, but I try to be sympathetic in my summary/comment.

I mentioned in part one that non-evidentiary arguments are less common than evidential ones, but that if you read a lot of philosophy of religion, you’ve probably come across one or two of them. William Lane Craig, for example, often appeals to non-evidential arguments in his writings. He thinks that moral values ​​make no sense under atheism because to have a coherent moral life we ​​must have ‘ultimate accountability’. That is, we must know that:

…Evil and wrong will be punished; justice will be vindicated. Despite the inequalities of life, at the end the scales of God’s justice will be balanced. (Craig, is goodness without God good enough?)

Here Craig identifies a moral goal that must be satisfied if moral living is to be possible. He then suggests that it is not possible without God. The problem with atheism is that life ends at the grave. I can be a total moral jerk all my life and not be punished for it; I can be a total moral saint and suffer needlessly. The morality or immorality of my behavior need have no bearing on my ultimate fate. This seems wrong to Craig. Morality should count for something in the end.

Common Objections To The Moral Argument

I have discussed this argument on a previous occasion and explained what I think is wrong with it. Kant’s non-evidential argument appears to be quite similar in its form. The only difference is that where Craig emphasizes ultimate accountability, Kant emphasizes ultimate goodness (which requires a combination of happiness and complete virtue). Byrne reconstructs Kant’s argument like this (I have modified it slightly):

Byrne does not actually provide a conclusion in his version of the argument. I did this because I think the argument must reach some kind of conclusion, even if it turns out to be a misleading or unimpressive one.

Byrne is not very explicit about this, but from my reading of him he offers five different objections to the Kantian argument. They all have different targets (see diagram above). The first aims at the conclusion of the argument:

There are unsubtle and subtle aspects to this. The subtle point is that this argument does not exclude the cognition of

Amazon.com: Morality Without God? (philosophy In Action): 9780199841356: Sinnott Armstrong, Walter: Books

Cosmological argument for the existence of god, fine tuning argument for the existence of god, moral argument for god, moral argument against the existence of god, strongest argument for the existence of god, kant moral argument for the existence of god, ontological argument for the existence of god pdf, argument against the existence of god, teleological argument for the existence of god, ontological argument for the existence of god, logical argument for the existence of god, transcendental argument for the existence of god